News

How to Develop an Open Mind

by Buddy 'Friendly' Wachenheimer
Saturday, December 8, 2007. 07:00AM
451 Views 14 Comments

"An open mind is a free mind. The person who closes his mind to new ideas, concepts and people is locking a door that enslaves their own mentality. Intolerance is a two-edged scythe that on its backswing cuts off opportunities and lines of communication.

When you open your mind, you give your imagination freedom to act for you. You develop vision.

It’s hard to realize now that there were people who laughed at the Wright Brothers’ experiments at flight. And, Lindbergh could scarcely find backers for his Trans-Atlantic flight.

Then mankind went to the moon – no one’s laughing now. It’s the scoffers who are held in scorn. A closed mind is a sign of a static personality. It lets progress pass it by and hence can never take advantage of the opportunities progress offers.

Only if you have an open mind can you grasp the full impact of the first rule of success: 'Whatever your mind can conceive and believe, your mind can achieve.'

People blessed with an open mind perform wonderful feats in business, industry and the professions while people with closed minds are still shouting 'impossible.'

It would be well for you to take stock of yourself. Are you among those who say 'I can' and 'It will be done' or do you fall in the group that says 'Nobody can' the very moment somebody else is accomplishing it?

An open mind requires faith – in yourself.

The days of superstition are gone. But the shadow of prejudice is as dark as ever. You can come out into the light by closely examining your own personality. Do you make decisions based on reason and logic rather than on emotion and preconceived ideas? Do you listen closely, attentively and thoughtfully to the other fellow’s arguments? Do you seek for facts rather than hearsay and rumor?

The human mentality withers unless in constant contact with the stimulating influence of fresh thought. The Communists knew, in their brain-washing technique, know that the quickest way to break a person’s will is to isolate their mind, cutting them off from books, newspapers, radio and other normal channels of intellectual communication.

Under such circumstances, the intellect dies for lack of nourishment. Only the strongest will and the purest faith can save it.

Is it possible that you have imprisoned your mind in a social and cultural concentration camp? Have you subjected yourself to a brainwashing of your own making, isolating you from ideas that could lead to success?

If so, it’s time to sweep aside the bars of prejudice that imprison your intellect.

Open your mind and set it free!"

-Updated Napoleon Hill

(login to vote or comment.)
Friday, December 14, 2007. 10:11AM by Bret Carpenter
Track said I should answer.....scroll down...
Friday, December 14, 2007. 07:09AM by Bret Carpenter
I told Feldman to build a fort!
Friday, December 14, 2007. 07:07AM by Bret Carpenter
Fortifications are military constructions and buildings designed for defense in warfare. Humans have constructed defensive works for many thousands of years, in a variety of increasingly complex designs. The term is derived from the Latin fortis ("strong") and facere ("to make"). The downfall of permanent fortifications had three causes. The ever escalating power of artillery and air power meant that almost any target that could be located could be destroyed, if sufficient force was massed against it. As such, the more resources a defender devoted to reinforcing a fortification, the more combat power that fortification justified being devoted to destroying it, if the fortification's destruction was demanded by an attacker's strategy. The second weakness of permanent fortification was its very permanency. Because of this it was often easier to go around a fortification, and with the rise of mobile warfare in the beginning of World War II this became a viable offensive choice. When a defensive line was too extensive to be entirely bypassed, massive offensive might could be massed against one part of the line allowing a breakthrough, after which the rest of the line could be bypassed. Such was the fate of the many defensive lines built before and during World War II, such as the Maginot Line, the Siegfried Line, the Stalin Line and the Atlantic Wall. (In the case of the Atlantic Wall, the purpose of the fortification was to delay an invasion to allow reinforcement.) The third weakness is that modern firepower has progressed far beyond the strength of permanent fortifications, as a simple artillery or bombing barrage can easily destroy the most complex modern fortification. It is also much easier and cheaper to produce those modern siege weapons than to build any kind of fortification. Instead field fortification rose to dominate defensive action. Unlike the trench warfare which dominated World War I these defenses were more temporary in nature. This was an advantage
Friday, December 14, 2007. 05:11AM by Buddy 'Friendly' Wachenheimer
Fort? WHAT YOU TALKIN BOUT WILLIS?
Thursday, December 13, 2007. 05:10PM by Bret Carpenter
I told him to build a fort.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007. 07:23AM by John Q Public
I really believe there are some people who are better than others. Did you know that the two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen... and stupidity. When they say, “Gee, the 21st century is an information explosion!" — I say no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that any idoit could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now — where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, anything. And all you're getting is an explosion of useless crap, which added to the other useless crap that was being done originally, only makes it that much worse................ If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007. 06:45AM by Richard Track
Bret!!!! i think you just answered Buddy, what you should answer Jeremy!!!!;p
Tuesday, December 11, 2007. 02:48PM by Bret Carpenter
GO to cube hell — Architecture/interior design firms have sold companies a bill of goods with these design schemes. They claim it increases communication, workflow and productivity. They say that they can design environments with more sunlight when offices are eliminated (although, more often than not, the offices are still there — they’re just filled by executives and pencil pushers). But what about employee morale? What about treating employees with respect by giving them a space to work in conducive to the type of work that they actually perform? P.S. Feldman in the other cube is mad as hell and wants a drink of water and some ice…….who is going the extra mile for our friend in need?
Sunday, December 9, 2007. 10:04AM by Richard Track
your mind is like a parachute it only works when open!!! heard it someplace tried it from the second floor didnt work guess i had a closed one that day
Saturday, December 8, 2007. 10:20AM by Buddy 'Friendly' Wachenheimer
Open your mind and set it free!
Saturday, December 8, 2007. 10:07AM by Bret Carpenter
TRUE
Saturday, December 8, 2007. 09:43AM by John Q Public
I wouldn't say that Bret, but Napoleon was.
Saturday, December 8, 2007. 08:39AM by Bret Carpenter
http://fora.tv/ the world is THINKING
Saturday, December 8, 2007. 07:41AM by michael Iva
Great choice Buddy! Hill is one of my favorite writers. Listen well to what he has to say, Adholes.