Information

Bumblebee Entree-Style Tuna Steaks

by Steve Portigal
Monday, April 11, 2005. 02:27PM
603 Views 10 Comments

This is the third in an occasional series of reviews of new grocery (and other) products that strike me as interesting or unusual. See also Tiger Power and Grapple.

Intro Bumblebee Entrée-Style Tuna is one of the latest Home Meal Replacement products arriving in the grocery store. Home Meal Replacement, a lovely industry term usually abbreivated as HMR (which always sounds a little too close to HRT (Hormone Replacement Therapy) for me).

The idea is to help busy families get a traditional-type meal on the table quickly, through some innovations in packaging and distribution and food design. And maybe getting people to think a bit differently about what actually is necessary to constitute a meal.

The Package The product comes in three flavors - we tried two of them: Lemon and Cracked Pepper, and Ginger and Soy. The third was Mesquite Grilled (not so appealing for tuna). Although check out the nutritional info - maybe we made the wrong choice because that Ginger & Soy has triple the sodium of the others - 43% of your RDA. Didn't they use to salt fish to preserve it? The packages are the latest foil envelope gizmo, the printing technology has come along since the early days of boil-and-bag. Bumblebee of course is a company known for tinned tuna (I'd call it canned tuna, but that doesn't ring as well, does it?), but small type indicates this is gourmet wild tuna, which presumably means that it was caught, not farmed. I didn't know that tuna was farmed, anyway, and I also assume that you can label anything as gourmet without challenge.

The back of the pouch shows the three easy steps (1 - Tear, 2 - Heat, 3 - Enjoy), with some helpful and encouraging requests such as "Notice the firm texture and seasoning!" and pointers to the "Convenient Preparation Options - The results are all Fabulous..." (and yeah, they did capitalize just Fabulous in that sentence - does that mean we need to have a Fabulous voice in our head when we read it? Fabulous!)

Preparation Couldn't be easier. Tear it open: and put it on a plate (or baking dish, or skillet) - it can be heated in the oven or microwave, or on the stove-top. We opted for the toaster oven. Whoops. A bit more goo comes flowing out of the pouch than one would expect. The picture on the back of the envelope is goo-free, and shows a much larger, thicker, and pinker looking steak than we got. And look how different the two flavors are. The Ginger and Soy (on the right) does have little sticks of ginger on top. I'm not sure what that is on the top of the other one. Let's just say that's spices, okay?

The instructions said a preheated-350-oven for 10 minutes. We used a toaster oven, and it wasn't pre-heated, so I went for 11 minutes.

Eating Cooked... and served... It wasn't good. It wasn't flaky, it was dry. It wasn't enough food - look at those portions - that's two halves on one plate (that way everyone got to try each flavor!). The rice was essential to mix in to each bit to try and stave off some of the dry tuna taste/texture.

Perhaps my 11-minute improvisation was disastrous to the end-product; I'd not expect that, but who knows how carefully they time these things in development. Conclusion Not such a good execution. Certainly, a compelling idea. Reasonably healthy and easy to prepare, just steps to a "real meal" - that definitely appeals to me. But if you are going to compromise at meal-time (and certainly that is almost inevitable) don't set the expectations so high? At least in a new product category, if you want to survive, don't set the expectations so high. This was not like eating fresh tuna, or even freshly prepared tuna. It was just over-flavored dry...something.

(login to vote or comment.)
Wednesday, April 13, 2005. 06:04AM by Steve Portigal
Wow - this is a tremendous moment - Adholes has a troll! It's like USENET from 1994, or AOL from 1997 or something. Sweeet!
Tuesday, April 12, 2005. 10:29AM by Alexis Adauto Ferguson
Steve, you rock. I always love the posts. Noted, will not buy this or the Grapples.
Tuesday, April 12, 2005. 09:55AM by M W
excellent report steve. i actually buy a lot of tuna in the foil pouches b/c i am loathe to deal with a can opener and draining, but despite the super-premium price for foil bag tuna, the cleanliness and ease induces me to eat it much more regularly - which i like. now, seeing i try to be a health geek and love tuna and salmon (brought up in the pacific northwest where you're introduced to fish shortly after pablum), i in fact, have purchased both the products you tested...interestingly, i have not eaten either yet...so i find your report quite timely...now, the interesting thing from a packaging design point of view is that yes, i purchased because the product looked good and healthy and obviously convenient (which works well for my laziness), but since the product is actually smaller than the pack suggests and there is a bounty of "goo" dripping out...and they're dry (which i'll judge for myself), the brand manager and design firm have deceived the consumer to the degree that, although initial purchase decisions are successful, the product promised on the pack doesn't match what's inside, so repeat purchases are going to be unlikely. too bad they couldn't have just honestly portrayed it...also, the lame-ass copywriting (Fabulous!) is a bad idea...now, sidebar to your last episode, i bought the grãpples last week. it cost $3.99 for four of them, but i did find them refreshing and delicious, plus i loved the smell, but for a buck per, i can't say i'd spend that again unless i'm having guests over for baked brie with fruit.
Tuesday, April 12, 2005. 09:16AM by Robert Moss
You may have had better success w/ a microwavable steamer or by even placing a shallow bowl of water next to the tuna. But as far as HMRs, this looks far worse.
http://www.albertsons.com/shop/asset... HEIGHT="150">
Tuesday, April 12, 2005. 08:10AM by Bonnie Natko
I wonder what the food stylist thought when on assignment for this one!
Tuesday, April 12, 2005. 06:52AM by Steve Portigal
Big apologies from me; technical failure on my part. Pictures are here!
Tuesday, April 12, 2005. 06:46AM by Steve Podielsky
I didn't get the pictures, though visualizing was easy with your comprehensive descriptions. Until they can find a way to safely serve tuna fresh and raw out of an envelope it's still just the same stinky fish of yesterday.
Monday, April 11, 2005. 04:16PM by Steve Portigal
Hmm. The pictures show up fine for me. I wonder if anyone else is having trouble seeing 'em? I wonder where the problem lies. Adholes is a dog today, jeez it's slow. I think I might have to eat some cheerios and Elmer's next time and write about that!
Monday, April 11, 2005. 03:27PM by Noelle Weaver
Steve - I love that you do this [but what happened to the pictures!?!] it's always interesting to read/hear a real consumer experience with a "yummy" new product vs. glossy magazine photos where the milk is actually elmer's glue.