|
|
Hey, Leanne Minichillo, why did you quit your day job as a Publicist? Oh, that's right. You're a creative writer, now. (See your words up there or here ---> "I used short, concise information that got my message through to my client’s audience, and as a creative writer, it was not easy trimming the frills, but I quickly learned its efficacy." Quick question, Leanne Minichillo. Why did you stop using 'concise information that got your message through to your audience' when you happened upon your calling as a creative writer?
|
Sadly, the only time I watch commercials is during the Super Bowl. The rest of the time my loyal companion clicks through them to find something to watch until the commercials are over. I never see any of them. *Sigh*
|
Speaking of amusing Fed Ex commercials and relating to human truth, I've got one.
I don't know if you have it in the US, but we've got it up here.
Angry boss screames out of his office (something like) "Who shipped that package to [Company X] yesterday!!!???"
You see the entire office fearfully camoflage themselves to fit in with the office (one lady becomes a tree, one meshes into the desk),to escape the boss' wrath. Then you finally some pimply-faced kid say "Umm, I did." Boss congratulates with "You're a hell of a man doing a hell of a job!"
Then they say something about Fed Ex.
Most people can relate to the idea of an angry boss and wanting to stay out of his way. Of course, it's overdramatic, with people trying to blend in.
But we hear the subject of the commercial in the beginning (shipping) and it's followed through to the end when the Fed Ex logo pops up.
Anyway, I thought I'd add that.
And I really hope that it is for Fed Ex or else my whole point is moot.
|
Kevin, go reread my post--you're missing the point. None of those "funny ads" for the most part, connected with a human truth. But citing 2000 is ridiculous. What were you doing in 2000? Nobody expects to have recall of a commercial in 3 months, let alone 5 years! You migh tbe hard-pressed to name any commercial that whole year. But I remember the Etrade one with the monkey, and I beleive Fed Ex had one with the color bars claiming the commercial was shipped by a competitor and therefore did not arrive on time.
|
UPDATE!!! I just found out, after seeing the commercial today, that the advertised product is Vim Creme bathroom cleanser.
Whoop dee do!
|
I think the ideas of certain products that are unique (like tabasco) stand the best chance of being remembered whether the ad is funny or not. Humor adds spice to the medium and agency's reptoire to draw the client. If you have built it, someone will come and ask for it. Hopefully the ad will be structured so that the average jill or joe will remember the humor and the product.
Here is a regional ad by an award winning director. Would you remember it or would you just remember the humor?
http://home.comcast.net/~tsu...
|
Tuesday, February 1, 2005. 10:38AM
by
x x
|
The Superbowl of 2000 was chock full of perhaps the funniest commercials ever. That was the last year where all the .com venture money was blown out with reckless abandon. Can you name one of those commercials? Can you name one of those companies? No, funny isn't the ticket. Funny is a good start. In the end, the goal isn't an award, it's increased sales and awareness for your client. These are not mutally exclusive concepts. BTW -- I betcha the Kinks song from Jess's post *way* down there was "Picture Book," used in those visually huge HP ads.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 08:06PM
by
M W
so leanne...does that mean canadian radio stations no longer have to play 10% canadian content - despite what the actual canadian listeners would prefer to listen to? that said, i think you took my self-deprecating, proud canadian, happy alien in america comment out of context...given this blog is about humor...and i was commenting on a lizard...named louie...who apparently sells beer. :)
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 07:23PM
by
Kim S
Let's not forget one singular important ingredient in the humor / product / ad relationship: US. As in ALL of us. The humor works because the scenario presented is something we as human beings can relate to. Think about it, Got Milk - brilliant we can all relate. Alka Selzer - we can ALL relate. Tabasco / mosquitos we can all relate. Marc you're right, the emotional response takes place because it's something to which we can ALL relate.
|
Funny ads are effective because they provoke an emotional response. Any emotional response will work, but making people cry, get irritated, or feel physical pain has not test well in focus groups.
|
Note to Mr. Wozniak – Canadian ads are relevant to Canadians. Our efforts lie in finding innovative ways of reaching a targeted audience rather than creating commercials using dogmatic American standards.
As for governmental control, the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) is the only government-funded broadcaster in the country (or did you forget that when you moved to the US?)
Canada has also dismantled the censorship board re-affirming some of our country’s most basic principles of freedom and diversity.
To those of you who are enthralled with European or Asian ads, why not check out your socially conscious, out-of-the-box-thinking neighboUrs to the north?
Look at the spot for Canada’s 'One Tonne Challenge', a governmental initiative to reduce the annual amount of greenhouse gas emissions. You’ll see what I’m talking about.
|
I've worked on humor ads at an agency that used to think it was career suicide to do heavy product hard-sell ads. They're all unemployed now, and the agency went out of business. To me the important element is not a human element - that's just what makes it funny or not. I think that for a humor ad to be truly effective, the situation or the punchline, or other major element of the ad HAS to be integral to the product. The Alka-Seltzer campaign from the :60s is a great example mentioned earlier. Same with the classic VW ads. Each one was unique, yet all built upon the brand. I had the good fortune of working on several of the old Miller Lite, "Tastes Great - Less Filling" spots. They were essentially the same concept over and over, with fresh characters and scripts. It was the single longest campaign in advertising. There are very few ads on today that are both funny and brand building.
I got out of the ad business (for the time being), and am doing interstitials for Spike TV. All I'm trying to do is be funny to the intended audience. They're not promos, they're entertainment pieces albeit short ones. This is the ultimate outlet for creatives who want to do funny spots, but don't care about selling a product. If you know good writers looking to do the same - have them contact me through my adholes private thingy.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 05:10PM
by
M W
mark, not sure what louie the lizard is....although, i lived in canada until 5 years ago and we didn't get a lot of american ads (canadian commy bastards running the government controlled media).
|
But why the constant push for humour? It is not easy to be funny. It is exceptional difficult to be funny three or four times in a row and it is a one in a million that the gag is funny twice... let alone the 15th, 16th, 17th time. It is almost like humour has become the lowest common denominator. "hey… who cares it's funny." Too many ads are funny, not many are clever and the majority of them are totally irrelevant to the product (as Marc points out). So is the client or the creative? Where's the push?
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 04:37PM
by
x x
Michael, you had to like Louie the Lizard.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 04:23PM
by
Kim S
Oh - yeah let's not forget the genius who came up with the ad for ?? (some kind of cell phone I guess ). It's where you have a plain Jane sitting next to a guy in a conference room and he says something like "you look great" and she says "Thank-you" and the guy says (to the phone) "excuse me for a minute" turns the plain Jane and says "did you say something." That ad CRACKS me up! Ever see the Girls Behaving Badly skit where she stands on the street corner talking to passers-by but she's really on the phone?? FUNNY STUFF - but alas - who the heck knows what the product was...
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 04:04PM
by
M W
i agree with marc...funny ads work when there is a natural punchline that ties the joke to the brand (hot sauce and a mosquito that got more than he bargained for), but i personally find those bud light ads...and mostly every beer commercial that uses humor, to be so contrived and irrelevant to the brand and product experience that it makes a bit of a negative impression on me...i mean seriously, talking claymation frogs and beer? the geico and aflac ads actually created a funny situation out of something iconic to their brands and it'd be impossible to steal that equity by a competitor...that said, now i understand why Budweiser uses the clydesdales, but maybe their ad agency just sucks or something b/c i don't find them funny at all...but then again. i will confess, that during the christmas season...i mean Christmas...i mean holiday season (whatever we're allowed to call it now) the Jack in the Box ads for "great holiday spirit" and the guy with the big-ass antlers walking down the hall - well, that made me laugh every time...still haven't eaten there though.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 03:42PM
by
x x
Bad news...I don't remember the Tabasco ad. Sorry.
|
I think the Tabasco ad works because Tabasco is such a dominant force in hot sauce. You think hot, you automatically think Tabasco, unlike Coke and Pepsi who have a duopoly, causing confusion. You could still swap any other hot sauce but of course, this ad creates a brand personality and also grabs that real estate before nyone else does.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 12:07PM
by
Kim S
Thank you Marc! The only other top of mind memorable funny ads are the Tabasco sauce one where the mosquito explodes, again where you tie the product directly to the humor, and the Coke ads produced in recent memory that use celebrity, humor and Coke and tie them nicely together. There's too many of those to count...
|
Humor + brand? AFLACK! I doubt anybody confuses the duck for the Gecko (which is another subliminal, and smart, way of connecting the brand name to what the person will likely remember, though the ads suck).
|
Funny ads are NOT the problem. What is the problem are funny ads, or any ads for that matter that do not hit upon a human truth and connect that truth to the product in a unique way. Take a look at most humor ads and you'll find you can easily swap a competitor's logo in and achieve the same result (which also shows the ridiculousness of some of my creative friends who will write a funny ad for a lesbian bar or something and shop it around to all of them until one buys it, with the hope of winning an award). That's a problem with strategy--either the initial strategy or the poor execution of an effective one. I used to get irritated when I was a junior working on Pepsi because all the TV Commercials I was involved with--my friends would go "Oh did you see that funny coke commercial where they made fun of Pepsi?" Well, Coke never puts Pepsi in their ads, nor do they do humor. But you see the problem--the ads were such that you could easily switch the two and it didn't make a difference. And often, people would make this switch subconsciously anyway. However, Kim correctly mentions the Got Milk campaign. This is an excellent example of how you take a human truth (you need to wash down that chocolate cake with milk after you eat it) and execute it in a humorous way (a guy thinks he's in heaven because he gets all this chocolate cake but discovers he's, in fact, in hell because they're out of milk.) You'll never mistake a Got Milk ad for anything else and they're some of the funniest commercials. They're also an example of how when you start with a great strategy, the ads just write themselves. Any of you could come up with your own version of one of these ads that would likely be at least pretty funny. This is all of course, award winning creative 101. Stay tuned for my advanced classes. :)
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 10:00AM
by
Kim S
Ah the music again! The Got Milk ads for sure
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 09:55AM
by
x x
For some reason one TV ad that came to mind was a long time ago, showing my age -- "I can't believe I ate the whole thing." I remember today that it was for Alka-Seltzer. How many similar funny ads have that lasting power? I know that Bud Lite always sticks with me through the humor.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 09:53AM
by
x x
That's what's great about European TV ads. No matter how funny or outrageous the body of the work is, at the very end of those ads they hit you -- BOOM -- with the product name. So it's ALWAYS the last thing you see on the typical ad over there. You're right, we tend to be more subtle here, and often the brand is lost.
|
Agreed--this happens all the time. Just this weekend my mom mentioned a commercial with an old Kinks song she loved--my brother was able to research it and get her the song, but she couldn't recall the company. It's a constant challenge on the creative side to find the right balance in unique delivery and brand identity.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005. 09:20AM
by
Kim S
I couldn't agree more. It always amazes me when the creative consumes the product. But hey, I like to be entertained so what the heck?
|
|
|