News

Google Should Hang Their Money-Grubbing Heads in Shame

by Leanne Minichillo
Wednesday, February 9, 2005. 05:47PM
408 Views 5 Comments

Tonight, I decided to do some research on sexual addictions. In an effort to find a local chapter of SAA (Sex Addicts Anonymous), I typed “"sex addicts anonymous"+"Toronto"” into my Google.ca search box. Recently, search engines have taken to selling sponsored links. For those of you who aren’t familiar with them, they’re usually found on the right-hand side of your results page and contain line ads for products and services relating to your search. Sponsored links are a great way to bring in extra revenue for the company, however, shouldn’t someone be monitoring them? I would think that, with an enormous site such as Google, they would employ people to read and effectively position the ads. I’m soooo wrong. A list of three sponsored links came up, and right there, at the top, was an ad for an escort agency boasting “Toronto's premiere escort agency. See our ladies online photos!” with a link to their web site. Let’s not talk about the fact that the ad is grammatically incorrect, but it’s completely tasteless. Has the almighty dollar become so powerful that ethics and basic human concern are compromised in such an obscene and blatant way? I recall an episode of Law & Order (I’m a devout viewer – RIP Lenny), where an Internet porn company purchases lists of recently released sexual offenders and spams their inboxes with pornography. In this particular episode, it was a child rapist/murderer who received pictures of girls made to look as though they were underage. Due to the stimulation that he received from the photos, he raped and killed a young girl. Who is responsible? Google should be ashamed of themselves for their lack of regulation. It’s about basic human decency and giving a damn about people, not just how much they have in their wallets.

If you’re as pissed the hell off as I am about this, you can call their corporate office at (650) 623-4000 Or email their PR people at press@google.com

Your comments are welcomed.

(login to vote or comment.)
Thursday, June 9, 2005. 06:24PM by Tanya Rauch
I'm new and just now reading this... RIP Lenny, Amen!
Thursday, February 10, 2005. 08:59AM by Ron Hammack
I'm not sure exactly how Adwords work, but a quick experiment reveals that a search for "anonymous sex toronto" (without the quotes) brings up the same sponsored ad. Maybe it just picks out the individual keywords from a phrase?
Thursday, February 10, 2005. 05:08AM by Darren Herman
Another issue here is that Google cannot monitor everyone who posts ads using their Adwords campaigns...if they did, they'd be monitoring over thousands over advertisers running campaigns - just not feasible and not in their business model. As for they keyword you were typing in, the company who targeted that had a pretty good chance of converting that user, as they were/are/ into sex at a high rate. You can target on keywords....This brings a significant ROI to the advertiser - fully measurable. Thus, why Google's marketcap is where it is. The hand to be slapped here is the advertiser, not Google IMHO.
Wednesday, February 9, 2005. 08:42PM by M W
but since when did advertising mean truth and honesty? it's about the sale and if you can catch someone in an oblique manner and get a hit, you're selling. sad but true.
Wednesday, February 9, 2005. 06:38PM by Liam Strain
Hmmm... I did a search for Sex Addiction, and nothing but good helpful links came up. Even all the sponsored ads. I've often wondered about their practices for selecting relevance in the ads. Whether it was by keyword only, or if there was a more intelligent ranking. It would seem that it is not monitored. They have a default "safety level" on their image searches...perhaps we should petition that they implement such an option in their regular search pages. Or give the option of turning off the ads...but we don't really want it to come to that.