News

Cubs Win World Series

by Jessica Rosenthal
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 10:22AM
589 Views 9 Comments

According to an article this morning on ,www.mediapost.com, next week magazines will break a trade ad campaign relying heavily on fake editorial content in major consumer magazines. At a time when the line between advertising and editorial content seems sometimes indistinguishable, this is part of a $40 million campaign crafted by Fallon New York for the Magazine Publishers of America. “The goal is to break through the clutter, and create some buzz around the unique connection consumers have with the magazines they read.” Headlines to include “Hell Freezes Over! Cubs Win 2105 World Series,” “Dow Hits 500,000,” and “TV’s Biggest Hit: Desperate Robots.” Upon closer inspection, consumers should notice that the magazines are post-dated February 28, 2105.

Of the fake editorial content samples provided, none bear a disclaimer noting that these are actual advertisements, and several MPA members believe “it’s a good thing to confuse the consumer in the industry’s ad campaign.”

I think it will be blatantly clear to the consumer that these are not real magazine covers, and while I’m curious to see this launch and its response, I see this as a very temporary buzz-creator and I’m not convinced that this is the $40 million solution to salvaging the print medium.

(login to vote or comment.)
Friday, February 25, 2005. 09:58AM by Rick Weber
Consumers are bombarded with millions of impressions a year. This ploy, however misleading, got your attention which is far more than others spending mega bucks on their campaigns can actually say. I'm with Mark in saying that differentiation is good. We live in a freedom of speech society. If we don't want to hear it, we can turn away. Thankfully.
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 07:49PM by Kevin Glennon
My business card is somewhat misleading print, too. One side (the one I don't show first) is a regular business card. The other side (that I LOVE to lead with) is all born-again-Christian-looking. It's got doves and a cross, and it says in big, light blue words, "Jesus Loves You." Then, in fine print underneath, it says, "Everybody else thinks you're an asshole." Everytime I get a cold referral, they say it's because they were shown my card, and they want a copy. My business practically doubled overnight with those things.
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 04:12PM by Liam Strain
I hate those fake 20s - I always get all excited that I'll be able to have a good lunch...but no... just a discount on a manicure again. My nails are fine damnit!
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 02:19PM by Kevin Glennon
My favorite misleading print ad are those little fake $20 bills you find on the ground. They look like a $20 that's folded over. You pick it up, and one side is the $20, and the other is the ad for whatever company sponsored it.
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 02:13PM by Capers Hammond
How is this different from the energizer bunny ads that won all kinds of awards? How about the Geico ads that pretend to be a reality tv promo. What's wrong with playing a little trick to get some one to read further? All advertising has to command attention or the money is wasted, the real power is in the message after they get your attention. Hopefully they pay it off well.
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 01:42PM by x x
Well, my first thought is that I hope they aren't really going to say on a springtime magazine cover that the Cubs or anyone else just won the World Series. That'll seem stupid. Overall, I look forward to anything that is something completely different. Have my same doubts as you about how it could have long-term value, though...guess we're about to find out. Meanwhile, the Cubs still might very well win the World Series this year without having to change 2005 to 2105; the Sammy trade was their best step forward.
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 12:47PM by Jesse Tayler
War of the World might have got more than they bargained for - but the were bargaining for media attention and they got it - any sign that did damage? I guess at the time, some people were rather upset!
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 12:45PM by Kim S
I concur.
Thursday, February 24, 2005. 11:21AM by shaun arora
Fooling consumers is not a way to win them over. It is a very clever concept, but I wonder if it will generate mistrust towards magazines or break through and win their respect. I guess it'll all be in the execution.
this comment is pending approval