Information

Killing Creativity

by Jeremy Fuksa
Monday, June 12, 2006. 08:42AM
479 Views 4 Comments

I tagged the inspiration of this article for the sidebar of my blog, however after mulling over it, I had to pull it into the center for some deliberation and expansion.

   

First off, read this article on the Slow Leadership site entitled How To Kill Creativity. Now, it seems to me that creativity in this sense applies to business processes, money-saving initiatives, and other like things, however, this article can just as easily apply to the creativity of advertising, marketing, public relations, or other related specialties.

   

Big, fat paraphrased quote that was too good not to include:

   
      

“In pressure-based cultures, old ideas are continually re-hashed, new ones tested to destruction, and any spark of innovation drowned in consensus-building. An idea that can’t be grasped in under five minutes by executives so distracted they can’t recall the next meeting on today’s schedule—or what was agreed at the last—is dead meat. There’s no time to be wrong, so there’s no time to be right either. Stick to what you’ve done before and get a move on. With such penalties for trying anything new, is it any wonder everyone quickly gets the message that, whatever fine words executives use, innovation isn’t wanted or valued?”

   
   
      

“These organizations don’t simply shoot themselves in both feet; they use machine guns. Their attitude ensures no new ideas will survive … As a result, they must run still faster to stay in business at all; and so have even less tolerance or time for risky, creative ideas. The result is self-induced obsolescence, followed by commercial suicide.”

   

   

Does this sound like where you work? If so, what can you do about it? As one of the biggest beaters of the creativity/innovation drum, I have only one suggestion… fight.

   

As John January of American Copywriter said in one of his posts: “Create or die.” Think about that. You got into a creative career because you have an innate desire to make things clever, aesthetically pleasing, functional, or a myriad of other goals of creativity. If you are steeped in a culture of fear and mediocrity, then your inner creative soul is being smothered or crushed. Yeah, that sounds melodramatic but in its own way it’s true. And, when your creative fire is extinguished, you are no longer effective in your position and you just have to get out and manage a QuikTrip.

   

So… fight for creativity. Fight for innovation. These are things that make life and business great and should be injected back into thought processes before mediocrity holds sway.

(login to vote or comment.)
Tuesday, June 20, 2006. 08:18AM by Peter Silvester
To use this great debate to complain about idea stealing is lame. Anyway, to fight the owners for creativity is one big up hill climb especially when there are so many things on their mind. Going above and beyond the make ups has given our business it's great reputation for excellence but that is not enough to stay in business these days. It takes great leadership and being a business owner does not make one a leader. A manager yes, but great leaders inspire and utilize human resources to their greatest potential. Managers just put out fires and make decisions based on fear. I went to a sort of a good speech one night at the California Club given by Bob Danzig. He spoke about what a great leader was. He could easily do this now that it is his business to give speeches and sell books. I would have to research his past to see if he in fact did what he spoke about. But that is my ignorance of him. Maybe if Bill Gates got up and spoke and ended his speech with how he has out lived his own usefulness at the helm and is continuing his great leadership by handing over duties to others... Now that is inspiring and a true story indeed.
Monday, June 12, 2006. 04:49PM by michael Iva
GOOD POINT TOM!!! See the wonderful original essay and weblog, "100 WAYS TO KILL A CONCEPT"; to see what actual kills creativity, plus how to prevent it.
Monday, June 12, 2006. 04:31PM by EXIT3A .com
Case in point: Remember the wonderful VW spot with the squares? Then came the Audi spot with the circles. Same idea. Different geometric shape. VW owns Audi, which explains why Audi approved the same idea a year or more after the VW spot (“Hey, what’s good for brother is good for sister.”) But it’s inexcusable that the agency with the Audi account presented the same idea. Doesn’t anyone, anywhere in this sad ad business have any ethics? By the way, has anyone heard when the Audi account is exiting McSpinney & Bronze?
Monday, June 12, 2006. 04:23PM by EXIT3A .com
History repeats itself. Particularly in advertising.