Weblog

News

New Quark Logo

by anDrew Wallace
Wednesday, March 7, 2007. 07:52AM
415 Views 6 Comments

Processings
Magnify
second rip off
Processings
Magnify
first rip off
Processings
Magnify
quark logos
Good or Bad? Doesn't it look like another logo? Does anybody even use Quark anymore? Why does everyone want to 3D their logo, whatever happened to simple is best?
(login to vote or comment.)

Comments

 6 shown
Tuesday, March 27, 2007. 01:40PM by
I agree with the comment below (Tracey)...I switched over to CS two years ago and I'm not looking back. Even when the programs are slow as molasses on my Macbook, I'd still rather be using them than Quark.
Thursday, March 8, 2007. 09:28AM by Tracey Lawrence
As if changing their logo will convince anyone to blow $750 on a product that's inferior to the page layout program that comes bundled (essentially for FREE) with Photoshop and Illustrator in Creative Suite. Puh-leeeze.
Thursday, March 8, 2007. 09:07AM by michael Iva
The original Quark logo was fine. Some new executive in a position of power at the company just wanted to put their own imprint on the company, for their own ego sakes, rather than for a real or necessary reason, thus this type of problem occurs. It happens all the time with logos, brand names, theme lines, and ad campaigns. Ego, usurps reason or need. Stay good bye to image equity and continuity, say hello to stupidity and other accompanying negative side effects.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007. 12:37PM by Marc Rapp
the first design was identical to the Scottish or Irish or something-Creative club. The color the mark, exactly identical to the clubs. The second one make no sense to me. A horrible effort pre-2.0 and even worse in print. It's so busy!
Wednesday, March 7, 2007. 09:08AM by anDrew Wallace
I think they are both rip offs, I've attached new images.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007. 08:15AM by Marc Lefton
It looks like a tunnel. It's awful. I like their last one better but wasn't a rip off?

Topics

Archives

Subscribe