Information

Is text messaging going to cause the demise of the English language?

by pat tobin
Tuesday, February 24, 2009. 10:46AM
1,322 Views 11 Comments

There are few, if any, studies that support the claim of causality between language variances used in text messaging and negative effects on other more formal modes of written communications. That said there is a great deal of anecdotal evidence that supports both negative and positive outlooks.

I’ve been reading everything I can put my hands on for days and it’s beginning to look like another passing panic. I’m wondering if part of the criticism is because teens have taken ownership of text messaging as their mode of communication to use in creating and maintaining their social circles.

The concerns parents and teachers have about negative effects of text messaging on language skills are balanced by many linguists who claim that learning variations of a language strengthens and expands skills. Perhaps the well-intentioned concerns surrounding text messaging and negative effects on the language skills express the existing concerns about perceived declines in children’s language skills and a desire to elevate those skills.

Our modes of writing emails or IMs have already set in motion a hybrid language that blends our writing and speaking styles. Text messaging has taken another step away from the traditional differences between the formality of our written language and our spoken language which is often much more casual. It is also taking brevity of language to a new extreme.

But before you can deviate from a standard you must have a concrete sense of the rules of that standard and then get creative. It is not an either or situation. It’s a get it right then play with it routine.

Abbreviation requires a sense of the sounds of words, letters and numbers and an awareness of whether a homophone might lead the reader to misunderstand the meaning of a message. Abbreviations require pragmatic decisions and knowledge that there are such things as alternative spellings.

Onomatopoeic, exclamatory spellings combine creativity and a bit of humor (arrrgh!,WooHoo!)—creativity and humor are something we can all use a bit more of. And if the replacement words used in texting-- technically paragrams, but commonly known as extonyms, adaptonyms or cellodromes -- are becoming part of regular teen banter then more power to them. It is their own language—much more creative and less annoying than Pig-Latin. If they cross over the line and use this language in inappropriate situation it’s more likely a challenge than a mistake.

The most prominent concern seems to be that children who frequently text message will lose their ability to identify and use proper grammar. But children realize that language is context specific. The ability to move between modes of language--to "code switch" is not new to children who can be real chameleons on many levels. They behave and speak differently with a teacher vs. another student. They know that the formality of manners and speech appropriate to use with friends will not do at all at grandmother's house. They write with different levels of formality when doing their homework or passing notes.

Are teens who text message going to lose their ability to use proper punctuation when necessary? I don’t worry about lack of punctuation. My concern is over use. I’m with Terry Pratchett when he tells us that: “Multiple exclamation points are a sign of a diseased mind.” And the late great Kurt Vonnegut Jr. delighted me every time he called semi-colons “transvestite hermaphrodites, standing for absolutely nothing. All they do is show you’ve been to college.” Yes, too much is much too much. Too little punctuation and your lose your audience.

Text messaging does not change the way teens use punctuation though. It becomes another plaything. If we are concerned that children learn proper punctuation let them to read their own writing aloud. Encourage an appreciation of the nuance punctuation allows.

The use of acronyms drives me crazy. The first time someone wrote BRB to me in an IM I thought the poor fool was drowning. And let’s talk about pictograms, symbols & emoticons. A picture can be worth a thousand words but these aren’t.

I am not much of a text messenger and surely not an enthusiast. However, the several matters that are of great concern to me are not text messaging-specific. The issue of etiquette and personal communication devices looms large in our society. There are no social constructs that protect us from the hurt of sitting beside someone who is busy texting or phoning people in far away places. I am so saddened seeing people walk down the street talking on their phone instead of being where they are. When I take a train I want to stare out the window and daydream to the sounds of the train. I move multiple times in search of peace and quiet. I am stunned by how out of contact we are with the world around us because we are so busy messing with our communication devices. AND I AM TIRED OF LISTENING TO OTHER PEOPLE’S PHONE CALLS.

And how does this affect our written and spoken language skills? What would it be like to go to lunch with a friend and have no interruptions? Might we remember the art of lively conversation? What about paying attention to the people surrounding us—noticing how they look, what they’re doing, if they’re humming (sans earplugs and ipod).

What will happen when we all forget how to wander through our neighborhoods and our own thoughts? You can’t have an imagination if you don’t daydream.

What is absolutely true is that our children are writing shorter pieces. Is it because we are truncating language when we text? No. We are truncating our lives. We have less to write because we see less, notice less, knock around ideas with our friends less. It is so much the same as fear of television rotting our brains—it’s not so much what we watch, who we call, how fast we text, what gaming we prefer—it’s what we are not doing when we are fumbling with our little techno-toys.

And before I step off my soapbox can we talk about health? My opthamologist has instructed me to take breaks from my computer screen, walk to a window, look at the most distant point, and stare blankly. Has anyone told you how to give your eyes a break?

We are heading for a huge health crisis—arms, wrists, thumbs—what on earth will happen to our thumbs? We are overusing so many muscle groups but not being taught how to stretch gently or practice exercises that reverse the way in which a muscle is overused repeatedly?

Actuality—we must return to actuality for long vacations. And take some time to think about the bigger picture—about balance. Panicking at each technical shift just distracts us from doing the real work of figuring out how to raise our kids to be compassionate human beings and from taking the time and care to examine our own humanity.

(login to vote or comment.)

Friday, September 18, 2009. 01:27AM by tiffany tiffanys
Thanks for your information, i have read it, very good!
Monday, March 2, 2009. 01:35AM by Ryan Drumwright
**Important note: I am not supporting the use of bad grammar. I just reread everything, and it appears that way. Grammar is important, yet we as ad folks need to keep up with the times and talk to our audiences using their language. -------- Remember that Gossip Girls billboard.. I liked that. Some say it was inappropriate (That is another post), but it struck a chord with me. Relevant to audience. http://commercial-archive.com/conten... -- Have a great day! Ryan
Monday, March 2, 2009. 01:29AM by Ryan Drumwright
Very interesting. Language definitely evolves. No doubt. Whether this is detrimental or not, who knows.... It would be interesting to follow the evolution of today's "proper" English language, and compare it to the "proper" English language of 100 years ago (according to Americans). ------------------- But that is not why I posted. Here is an interesting tidbit I learned this weekend. The English language is not the only language 'threatened' by the digital age. French is evolving as well. I was talking to one of Winthrop's French exchange students and she was telling me about the French language. She told me that short hand terms such as "LOL" are now considered legitimate words amongst French youth. If they say something that is funny, they follow it with "LOL" (which sounds like 'Lull"). They attributed this to the popularity of MSN Messenger, the highly popular instant messaging tool. It is important to note that this is primarily used by the emerging French youth. Have a great day and great post Pat! --- Ryan
Friday, February 27, 2009. 02:12PM by Buddy 'Friendly' Wachenheimer
CIA Following Bin Laden on Twitter.... Hopes to Locate Madmen Via Tweets.... In what some are calling a breakthrough in the hunt for the world's most wanted man, the Central Intelligence Agency revealed today that it is following Osama bin Laden on Twitter.... The decision to track Mr. bin Laden's movements, moods, and musical tastes came late last week after the agency discovered he was using the popular social networking utility.... "We thought we were detecting an increase in chatter from Osama bin Laden," CIA chief Leon Panetta told reporters today. "What it turned out to be was an increase in tweets." Mr. Panetta said the agency's success in tracking Mr. bin Laden via Twitter would depend on its ability to decode a series of seemingly indecipherable messages.... "So far he is tweeting in code, using such terms as LOL and OMFG," Mr. Panetta said. "At this point we have no idea what he is trying to say." The spy chief said that Mr. bin Laden's Twitter usage seems to peak between the hours of 8 and 9 PM on Mondays: "This may simply be a coincidence, but that's when Gossip Girl' is on."
Thursday, February 26, 2009. 02:57PM by pat tobin
Just found an article that does a fine job of supporting everything I said: http://arstechnica.com/gadget...
Wednesday, February 25, 2009. 05:07AM by michael Iva
Penmanship, spelling, grammar, and the violating the English language aside; the simple act of people reaching out to other people to communicate in order to create or maintain their social circles is a wonderful thing and well worth any perceived or real negative side effects. Unfortunately, we all live in an overly pervasive virtual, simulated, and artificial environment which has stripped away our understanding of reality, plus made us more time-poor, energy-drained, and frightened than need be. Communicating with each other helps to keep earth’s ultimate predators from killing and preying on each other. Personally, I’ll take that trade out, any day. Great weblog Pat, I really enjoyed it.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009. 07:02PM by Marc Lefton
I used to have barely discernible chicken scratches. Now it's a struggle just to form basic letters. My hand cramps from the misuse. I bring my laptop to meetings. If I do that I could actually transcribe an entire meeting. By hand I write like little phrases to try to jog my memory later.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009. 05:35PM by Sonya B
I don't think texting is ruining communication with children or anyone else. However, typing is ruining penmanship. I used to have beautiful handwriting, and I write so rarely now that it's barely discernible chicken scratches. I've noticed this in other people too. I can print, but that's about it.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009. 04:21PM by Marc Lefton
And I'm tired of listening to people's conversations too. I take the Long Island Rail Road 2 hours each way to Manhattan every single day. And would you believe there are people who actually have someone to talk to at 7am when I get on the train? Usually these people have totally ridiculous ring tones, to which I will mock "what are you like FIVE? Put that shit on VIBRATE." There have been fist fights over cell usage - one guy is infamous for being arrested several times for assaulting passengers. I kind of wish sometimes he rode my train.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009. 04:19PM by Marc Lefton
In all seriousness though, thanks for the well-written and researched article. "But children realize that language is context specific." - I haven't found this with all children. Many of my friends who are educators have spoken of their students writing in "text-speak" in essays. I've even had cover letters like this. I think smart kids are context aware. Kids who have difficulty with language may find that text messaging might further obfuscate the situation.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009. 04:13PM by Marc Lefton
i dont no what u r talking about.